Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 70-73.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Supported by:
Abstract: The reason of serious decline in the conductivity of No. 3 jet fuel after long-distance pipeline transportation and the effect of adding antistatic agent on the conductivity and water reaction of the jet fuel were analyzed. The effects of long-distance pipeline transportation on the electrical conductivity and water reaction of refined jet fuel and distillate fraction were compared to see the advantages and disadvantages of the two pipeline transportation modes. For the long-distance pipeline transportation of No. 3 jet fuel, it was suggested that the preferred way to inject antistatic agent at the end of the pipeline transportation of jet fuel distillate. When the pipeline transport and car transport were needed at the same time, it was advisable to adopt the method of product pipeline transportation and to add the least amount of antistatic agent at the end of pipeline according to the electrical conductivity attenuation.
Key words: pipeline transport, jet fuel, electrical conductivity, water reaction
CLC Number:
 
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.sylzyhg.com/EN/
http://www.sylzyhg.com/EN/Y2019/V50/I12/70