石油炼制与化工

• 催化剂 • 上一篇    下一篇

硫化态和氧化态RS-1型加氢精制催化剂开工对比

谢洪波 胡国银   

  1. 中国石化镇海炼化分公司炼油五部 中国石化镇海炼化分公司炼油五部
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-02 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-09-12 发布日期:2009-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 谢洪波

STARTUP PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SULFURIZED STATE AND OXIDATION STATE RS-1 HYDROFINING CATALYSTS

  

  • Received:2009-02-02 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-09-12 Published:2009-09-12

摘要: 介绍了石油化工科学研究院开发的硫化态、氧化态RS-1型加氢精制催化剂在镇海1.20 Mt/a连续重整装置预加氢精制单元中的开工情况。结果表明,硫化态催化剂RS-1(S)、氧化态催化剂RS-1(O)在同一套重整预加氢装置上的开工都取得了一次成功,开工后催化剂反应系统参数一致,催化剂运行活性接近。对比分析结果表明,用硫化态催化剂开工,比氧化态催化剂开工具有投资省、污染小、开工过程简单、开工时间短、开工成本低、安全可靠等优点。

关键词: 连续重整, 加氢催化剂, 投产

Abstract: Two hydrofining catalysts, oxidation state RS-1(O) and sulfurized state RS-1(S), developed by Research Institute of Petroleum Processing were applied in the pre-hydrofining of 1.20 Mt/a CCR unit of SINOPEC Zhenhai Company, and the startups of using these two catalysts were reviewed. The commercial results showed that the hydrofining performances of both catalysts were excellent, the startups were successful and the properties of treated feeds well met the requirements of CCR process. As a comparison, when using RS-1(S) catalyst the startup was less pollutive, less time consuming, more cost saving, more reliable and with simple startup procedure.

Key words: CCR, Hydrogenation catalyst, startup