石油炼制与化工 ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 1-12.
• 综述 • 下一篇
王子朋1,2,王晶晶2,王延飞2,郑梦莲1
收稿日期:2025-10-13
修回日期:2025-11-21
出版日期:2026-02-12
发布日期:2026-01-27
通讯作者:
王延飞
E-mail:wangyanfei010@petrochina.com.cn
Received:2025-10-13
Revised:2025-11-21
Online:2026-02-12
Published:2026-01-27
摘要: 随着全球“双碳”目标的推进,能源转型的核心挑战聚焦于风光电等可再生能源的高效利用,而质子交换膜(PEM)电解水过程响应速度快、能耗低、产氢压力高,适应可再生能源发电的波动性特征。目前质子交换膜电解槽(PEMEC)的高成本制约其大规模应用,优化流道设计以提高电流密度是实现降本增效的关键技术路径。分析了平行、蛇形、叉指形、网格状流道等类型的优劣,并总结了流道与其他组件(如扩散层、催化层)的协同优化研究进展。结果表明,通过优化流道几何形状,可以有效改善流体动力学特性,提升传质和传热效率,同时减少流动阻力、气泡滞留以及局部电流密度不均等问题,显著提高电解槽的整体性能,可为PEMEC的进一步优化提供参考。
王子朋 王晶晶 王延飞 郑梦莲. 质子交换膜电解槽流场结构研究现状及展望[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(2): 1-12.
| [1] 马娟. 国务院关于印发《2024—2025年节能降碳行动方案》的通知_节能与资源综合利用_中国政府网[EB/OL]. [2025-10-11]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/202405/content_6954322.htm. [2] Wang Y, Wang Z, Qiao J, et al. Materials and flow fields of bipolar plates in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: A review[J]. Energy Reviews, 2025, 4(2): 100132. [3] Teuku H, Alshami I, Goh J, et al. Review on bipolar plates for low‐temperature polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2021, 45(15): 20583-20600. [4] 向新向绿向未来 推动新能源发展“风光无限”——全国政协“大力推动我国新能源高质量发展”调研综述[EB/OL]. [2025-09-16]. http://www.cppcc.gov.cn/zxww/2025/08/26/ARTI1756177202227537.shtml. [5] 高比例新能源地区电力系统灵活性资源现状、难点与对策研究--中国能源新闻网[EB/OL]. [2025-09-17]. https://www.cpnn.com.cn/news/baogao2023/202509/t20250902_1828785.html. [6] 中国氢能发展报告(2025)[J]. 中国质量万里行, 2025(4): 74. [7] Liang H, Lin S, Zhao K, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of alkaline electrolyzer with an advanced partitioned point flow channel[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 86: 1252-1261. [8] Duan X, Xiang X, Chen J, et al. Numerical simulation and multi-objective optimization on flow performance of novel alkaline water electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 55: 1505-1513. [9] Wang Y, Wen C, Tu J, et al. The multi-scenario projection of cost reduction in hydrogen production by proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis in the near future (2020–2060) of China[J]. Fuel, 2023, 354: 129409. [10] Hydrogen Insights September 2023[J]. 2024. [11] Wang Lu, Xu Zhiliang, Jin hao, et al. Photovoltaic-coupled Modular PEM Electrolyzer Hydrogen Production Technology[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2025, 54(3): 79-85. 王露, 徐智良, 金浩, 等. 光伏耦合组合式PEM电解槽制氢技术[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2025, 54(3): 79-85. [12] Liu Wenmiao, Li Jianzhong, Zhang Leiqi, et al. Review on failure mechanisms and diagnosis of proton exchange membrane electrolyzers and fuel cells[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2025: 1-17. 刘文淼, 李建中, 章雷其, 等. 质子交换膜电解槽和燃料电池故障机理与诊断综述[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2025: 1-17. [13] Xu B, Ouyang T, Wang Y, et al. Progresses on two-phase modeling of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer[J]. Energy Reviews, 2024, 3(3): 100073. [14] Green hydrogen cost reduction: scaling up electrolysers to meet the 1.50 C climate goal. Abu Dhabi. 2020. Irena, 2020. [15] Toghyani S, Afshari E, Baniasadi E, et al. Thermal and electrochemical performance assessment of a high temperature PEM electrolyzer[J]. Energy, 2018, 152: 237-246. [16] Xiong K, Wu W, Wang S, et al. Modeling, design, materials and fabrication of bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cell: A review[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 301: 117443. [17] LONG Xiao, ZHANG Jinbin, CHEN Lingte. Prospects for Future Energy Technologies[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(4): 651-693. 龙潇, 张晋宾, 陈令特. 未来能源技术展望[J]. 发电技术, 2025, 46(4): 651-693. [18] 洪捐, 魏伟, 刘岩岩, 等. PEM电解槽流场结构的数值模拟及实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025, 46(7): 559-567. [19] Luo X, Ren C, Song J, et al. Design and fabrication of bipolar plates for PEM water electrolyser[J]. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2023, 146: 19-41. [20] Lee W, Pyun I, Na Y. Concentric circular flow field to improve mass transport in large-scale proton exchange membrane water electrolysis cells[J]. Energy Reports, 2024, 12: 3645-3653. [21] Garcia N J, Schulze M, Friedrich K A. Understanding the role of water flow and the porous transport layer on the performance of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers[J]. 2019. [22] Hassan A H, Liao Z, Wang K, et al. Characteristics of different flow patterns for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis with circular geometry[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 49: 1060-1078. [23] Yang Y, Hao J, Zhou J, et al. Thermo-electric coupling dynamic modeling and response behavior analysis of PEMEC based on heat current method[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2025, 236: 126395. [24] Liu H, Li P, Wang K. Optimization of PEM fuel cell flow channel dimensions—Mathematic modeling analysis and experimental verification[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(23): 9835-9846. [25] Bao Z, Niu Z, Jiao K. Analysis of single- and two-phase flow characteristics of 3-D fine mesh flow field of proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 438: 226995. [26] Duy D T, Duy V N, Thi T C, et al. Anode and Cathode Flow Field Design and Optimization of Parametric Performance of PEMFC[J]. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2021, 16(10): 211028. [27] Zhang L H. Enhancing oxygen transport performance with improved serpentine flow field on the anode side of the PEMEC[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024. [28] Zhang T, Cao Y, Zhang Y, et al. Relationship of local current and two-phase flow in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2022, 542: 231742. [29] Guo H, Guo Q, Ye F, et al. Three-dimensional two-phase simulation of a unitized regenerative fuel cell during mode switching from electrolytic cell to fuel cell[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 195: 989-1003. [30] Li Y. In-situ investigation of bubble dynamics and two-phase flow in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. international journal of hydrogen energy. [31] Dang D K, Zhou B. Numerical analysis of bubble behavior in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer flow field with serpentine channel[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 88: 688-701. [32] Jeon D H. Effect of channel-rib width on water transport behavior in gas diffusion layer of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 423: 280-289. [33] Yong Z, Shirong H, Xiaohui J, et al. 3D multi-phase simulation of metal bipolar plate proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack with cooling flow field[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 273: 116419. [34] Rahimi E M, Rahgoshay S M, Hassani M M, et al. Novel design and numerical evaluating of a cooling flow field in PEMFC with metallic bipolar plates[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020: S0360319920326008. [35] Zhuang Y, Cui P, Long R, et al. Multi-objective optimization of channel structure for a proton exchange membrane water electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 49: 337-352. [36] Cooper N J, Smith T, Santamaria A D, et al. Experimental optimization of parallel and interdigitated PEMFC flow-field channel geometry[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(2): 1213-1223. [37] Chen Z, Wang X, Liu C, et al. Numerical investigation of PEM electrolysis cell with the new interdigitated-jet hole flow field[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(78): 33177-33194. [38] Zhang T. Measurement and simulation of voltage differences under ribs and channels and temperature variations within channels in PEMEC[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024. [39] Ojong E T, Kwan J T H, Nouri-Khorasani A, et al. Development of an experimentally validated semi-empirical fully-coupled performance model of a PEM electrolysis cell with a 3-D structured porous transport layer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(41): 25831-25847. [40] Aubras F, Deseure J, Kadjo J J A, et al. Two-dimensional model of low-pressure PEM electrolyser: two-phase flow regime, electrochemical modelling and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(42): 26203-26216. [41] Yin Y, Wu S, Qin Y, et al. Quantitative analysis of trapezoid baffle block sloping angles on oxygen transport and performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 271: 115257. [42] Olesen A C, R?mer C, K?r S K. A numerical study of the gas-liquid, two-phase flow maldistribution in the anode of a high pressure PEM water electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(1): 52-68. [43] Olesen A C, Frensch S H, K?r S K. Towards uniformly distributed heat, mass and charge: A flow field design study for high pressure and high current density operation of PEM electrolysis cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 293: 476-495. [44] Yu Y, Yuan X Z, Li H, et al. Current mapping of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with a segmented current collector during the gas starvation and shutdown processes[J]. [45] Ouyang T, Chen J, Huang G, et al. A novel two-phase model for predicting the bubble formation and performance in microfluidic fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 457: 228018. [46] Leng Y, Ming P, Yang D, et al. Stainless steel bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Materials, flow channel design and forming processes[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 451: 227783. [47] Badduri S R, Srinivasulu G N, Rao S S. Experimental analysis of PEM fuel cell performance using lung channel design bipolar plate[J]. [48] Su X, Zhang Q, Xu L, et al. A novel combined flow field design and performance analysis of proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 61: 444-459. [49] Wang Z, Ao Y, Yu Y, et al. Comparative study on the performance of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer with nickel foam as flow channel ribs[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 117: 337-352. [50] Teuku H, Alshami I, Goh J, et al. Review on bipolar plates for low‐temperature polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzer[J]. [51] Keller N, Hübner P, Von Unwerth T. Investigation of intrusion effects of a gas diffusion layer into channel cross sections depending on channel parameters of metallic bipolar plates[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(30): 15366-15379. [52] Zhou T, Wang C, Cheng X, et al. Two-phase flow characteristics on porous layer in PEM electrolyzer under different flow channel layouts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 80: 249-260. [53] Yang R, Yesuraj J, Kim K. Effect of Flow Channel Shape and Operating Temperature on the Performance of a Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Cell[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2023, 37(16): 12178-12191. [54] Toghyani S, Afshari E, Baniasadi E, et al. Thermal and electrochemical analysis of different flow field patterns in a PEM electrolyzer[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 267: 234-245. [55] Jia Y, Zeng M, Barnoon P, et al. CFD simulation of time-dependent oxygen production in a manifold electrolyzer using a two-phase model[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 126: 105446. [56] Manso A P, Marzo F F, Barranco J, et al. Influence of geometric parameters of the flow fields on the performance of a PEM fuel cell. A review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(20): 15256-15287. [57] Kahraman H, Orhan M F. Flow field bipolar plates in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell: Analysis & modeling[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 133: 363-384. [58] Lim B H, Majlan E H, Daud W R W, et al. Effects of flow field design on water management and reactant distribution in PEMFC: a review[J]. Ionics, 2016, 22(3): 301-316. [59] Wang C K, Huang C H, Shen M Y, et al. Investigation of five flow channel designs in PEM electrolysis with titanium felt[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024: S036031992402809X. [60] Zhou T. Two-phase flow characteristics on porous layer in PEM electrolyzer under different flow channel layouts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024. [61] Tijani A S, Barr D, Rahim A H A. Computational Modelling of the Flow Field of An Electrolyzer System using CFD[J]. Energy Procedia, 2015, 79: 195-203. [62] Zhou J, Niu W, Ao Y, et al. Numerical investigations on electrolytic performance of proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell with parallel flow field[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 256: 124164. [63] Wang C K, Huang C H, Shen M Y, et al. Investigation of five flow channel designs in PEM electrolysis with titanium felt[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 139: 956-962. [64] Chen W H, Wang Y S, Chang M H, et al. Optimization of Flow Channel Design with Porous Medium Layers in a Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Cell[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(15): 5642. [65] Zhang Z, Xing X. Simulation and experiment of heat and mass transfer in a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(39): 20184-20193. [66] Lin R, Lu Y, Xu J, et al. Investigation on performance of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer with different flow field structures[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 326: 120011. [67] Fu L, Lin H, Liu J, et al. Optimization of sinusoidal wave-like channel design for HT-PEMFCs based on genetic algorithm[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2024, 232: 125964. [68] Majasan J O, Cho J I S, Maier M, et al. Effect of anode flow channel depth on the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyser[J]. ECS Transactions, 2018, 85(13): 1593-1603. [69] Barzegari M M, Khatir F A. Study of thickness distribution and dimensional accuracy of stamped metallic bipolar plates[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(59): 31360-31371. [70] Su C, Chen Z, Zhan H, et al. Optimal design and performance analysis of anode flow channels in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 248: 123201. [71] Zhuang Y, Cui P, Long R, et al. Multi-objective optimization of channel structure for a proton exchange membrane water electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 49: 337-352. [72] Ruiz D D H, Sasmito A P, Shamim T. Numerical Investigation of the High Temperature PEM Electrolyzer: Effect of Flow Channel Configurations[J]. ECS Transactions, 2013, 58(2): 99-112. [73] Wen M, He K, Li P, et al. Optimization design of bipolar plate flow field in PEM stack[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 274: 12148. [74] Ma Z. A comprehensive modeling method for proton exchange membrane electrolyzer development[J]. [75] Kim C S, Jung J, Jang J H, et al. Micro fluidic structure selection of metal mesh combinations in proton exchange membrane fuel cells for air supply enhancement[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(57): 32808-32815. [76] Zhou H, Chen B, Meng K, et al. Combination effect of flow channel configuration and anode GDL porosity on mass transfer and performance of PEM water electrolyzers[J]. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2022, 6(17): 3944-3960. [77] Escobedo E. Design, construction, and performance of a próton exchange membrane water electrolyzer (PEM-WE)[J]. 2023. [78] Zhou Junjie,Niu Wanyuan,Tang Songzhen, et al. Numerical simulation of snake channel for proton exchange membrane electrolyzer[J]. Cryogenics / Refrigeration, 2024, 52(5): 56-62. 周俊杰, 牛万源, 汤松臻, 等. 质子交换膜电解槽蛇形流道数值模拟[J]. 低温与超导, 2024, 52(5): 56-62. [79] Li G, Wu L, Qin Y, et al. Gradient catalyst layer design towards current density homogenization in PEM water electrolyzer with serpentine flow field[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 314: 118659. [80] Kerkoub Y, Benzaoui A, Haddad F, et al. Channel to rib width ratio influence with various flow field designs on performance of PEM fuel cell[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 174: 260-275. [81] Dhahad H A, Alawee W H, Hassan A K. Experimental study of the effect of flow field design to PEM fuel cells performance[J]. Renewable Energy Focus, 2019, 30: 71-77. [82] Weng F B, Dlamini M M, Hwang J J. Evaluation of flow field design effects on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(39): 14866-14884. [83] Sevinc H, Hazar H. A novel approach to bipolar plate design in fuel cells with unique flow field geometries[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2025, 343: 120237. [84] Gong M, Na Y. Louver and step flow field design to increase the water content of the membrane of an electrochemical hydrogen compressor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 78: 513-523. [85] Jianxin L, Le W, Xiaolei Z, et al. Study on interdigital flow field structure and two phase flow characteristics of PEM electrolyzer[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, 2024, 202: 109868. [86] Badduri S R, Srinivasulu G N, Rao S S. Influence of bio-inspired flow channel designs on the performance of a PEM fuel cell[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, 28(3): 824-831. [87] Wang X, Wang Z, Feng Y, et al. Three-dimensional multiphase modeling of a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell with a new interdigitated-jet hole flow field[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2022, 65(5): 1179-1192. [88] Olesen A C, R?mer C, K?r S K. A numerical study of the gas-liquid, two-phase flow maldistribution in the anode of a high pressure PEM water electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(1): 52-68. [89] Lafmejani S S. VOF modelling of gas-liquid flow in PEM water electrolysis cell micro-channels[J]. [90] Wang K, Wang Y, Yu Z, et al. Multi-technique experimental characterization of a PEM electrolyzer cell with interdigitated-jet hole flow field[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 306: 118276. [91] Wei Q, Fan L, Tu Z. Hydrogen production in a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell (PEMEC) with titanium meshes as flow distributors[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(93): 36271-36285. [92] Li H, Nakajima H, Inada A, et al. Effect of flow-field pattern and flow configuration on the performance of a polymer-electrolyte-membrane water electrolyzer at high temperature[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(18): 8600-8610. [93] Atyabi S A, Afshari E. Three-dimensional multiphase model of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with honeycomb flow field at the cathode side[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 214: 738-748. [94] Toghyani S, Afshari E, Baniasadi E. Metal foams as flow distributors in comparison with serpentine and parallel flow fields in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 290: 506-519. [95] Tirumalasetti P R. A comparative numerical analysis of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer using different flow field dynamics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024. [96] Wang H, Chang K, Yang J, et al. Multi-objective optimization of bionic leaf-vein flow field for a PEMEC based on neural network and genetic algorithm[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 100: 1083-1094. [97] Chen Z, Zuo W, Zhou K, et al. Numerical investigation on the performance enhancement of PEMFC with gradient sinusoidal-wave fins in cathode channel[J]. Energy, 2024, 288: 129894. [98] Wang W, Han B, Cao B, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of bubble dynamics and design optimization of microchannel in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(93): 36240-36253. [99] Toghyani S, Afshari E, Baniasadi E. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer with new flow field pattern[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2019, 135(3): 1911-1919. [100] Cai Y, Liu X, Wei F, et al. Numerical and experimental study on mass transfer and performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with a gradient 3D flow field[J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 361: 122982. [101] Anyanwu I S, Hou Y, Xi F, et al. Comparative analysis of two-phase flow in sinusoidal channel of different geometric configurations with application to PEMFC[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(26): 13807-13819. [102] Hu K, Zhong Z, Huang D, et al. Optimal design of the diphasic flow pattern in water electrolyzers with CFD-independent multiphysics model[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 296: 117674. [103] Zhang Z, Guo M, Yu Z, et al. A novel cooperative design with optimized flow field on bipolar plates and hybrid wettability gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane unitized regenerative fuel cell[J]. Energy, 2022, 239: 122375. [104] Yang G, Yu S, Kang Z, et al. A novel PEMEC with 3D printed non-conductive bipolar plate for low-cost hydrogen production from water electrolysis[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 182: 108-116. [105] Suzuki T, Kato A, Yamaguchi S, et al. Measurement of liquid water distribution in GDL under cross-flow-inducing parallel flow field using operando synchrotron X-ray radiography[J]. Journal of Power Sources Advances, 2023, 22: 100119. [106] Li M, Li Y, Qin Y, et al. Water droplet detachment characteristics on surfaces of gas diffusion layers in PEMFCs[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(18): 10341-10351. [107] Zhang X, Chen S, Xia Z, et al. Performance Enhancements of PEM Fuel Cells with Narrower Outlet Channels in Interdigitated Flow Field[J]. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 1412-1417. [108] Upadhyay M, Lee S, Jung S, et al. Systematic assessment of the anode flow field hydrodynamics in a new circular PEM water electrolyser[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(41): 20765-20775. |
| [1] | 刘居昱 魏奕新 朱洪翔 邱彤. 基于Mie势的烷基苯力场开发与气液相平衡性质模拟[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(3): 74-83. |
| [2] | 陈海辉. DMTO再生器主风分布管磨损机制分析及应对措施[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(3): 145-151. |
| [3] | 吕超 王明 刘洋 魏宁. 相变散热-液冷散热耦合方法对十字形电子元件的散热效果研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(2): 182-189. |
| [4] | 王文琼 陶彦君 徐成杰 王志远. 泡沫金属强化SOEC原料电加热器传热性能的数值模拟[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(2): 190-199. |
| [5] | 赵云鹏 张纯 郭建豪 张海芹 蓝兴英 高金森 石孝刚. 固定床内不同形状催化剂颗粒对流体流动特性影响的模拟研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(2): 134-145. |
| [6] | 沈硕 唐克 洪新 陈京辉 秦悦. 不同硅铝比ZSM-5分子筛的吸附脱氮性能研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(1): 58-67. |
| [7] | 余建明 阎龙 王宝金. 延迟焦化加热炉辐射段的模拟分析[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2026, 57(1): 88-93. |
| [8] | 祝功胜 叶启亮 杨敬一 袁佩青. 催化裂化装置分馏及吸收稳定系统模拟与优化[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(9): 99-105. |
| [9] | 王小强 田亮 杨淑萍 赵祺铭 李晨阳 邱彤 李博. 蒸汽裂解炉模拟优化软件EcSOS的开发及应用[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(8): 94-100. |
| [10] | 孙乾慧 李强 李愿来. 基于粒子群的模拟移动床吸附分离过程多目标优化[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(8): 86-93. |
| [11] | 赵丹 王彦娟 安鑫宇 张健 叶昊天. 双效精馏在炼厂气分馏工艺中的应用[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(8): 101-106. |
| [12] | 穆佳昕 王俊 张然 杨鹤. 基于ReaxFF MD方法模拟汽油中C6模型化合物的氧化裂解特性[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(8): 48-58. |
| [13] | 偶国富 张嘉琪 赵宇培. 常压蒸馏塔塔顶回流系统挥发线盐酸露点腐蚀特性研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(8): 163-170. |
| [14] | 彭良溢. 对苯二甲双酰基衍生物稠化剂的合成与润滑性能研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(8): 122-128. |
| [15] | 国钰奇 王德华 朱宁. 对二甲苯提纯装置短周期运行模拟研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2025, 56(7): 128-135. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
京公网安备 11010802027553号