Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals ›› 2016, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 20-24.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
The performance of FH-98 and FH-40C catalyst developed by FRIPP in a 450 kt/a coking gasoline hydrogenation unit of PetroChina Karamay Petrochemical Co. Ltd.was compared. The results indicate that both catalysts displayed excellent activity in hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN). The qualities of the hydrogenated gasoline in both cases meet the feedstock requirements for reforming pre-hydrogenation unit. As FH-98 catalyst has certain cracking performance, it is easy to cause large temperature fluctuations or runaway of the bed temperature, resulting in higher operation risk. In contrast the FH-40C catalyst is found to be safer in terms of sustaining a moderate reaction temperature due to its weaker cracking capability.
Key words: FH-98, FH-40C, catalyst, coker gasoline, hydrogenation
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.sylzyhg.com/EN/
http://www.sylzyhg.com/EN/Y2016/V47/I8/20
[1] Rasmus G. Egeberg, Rasmus Breivik [J]. 托普索公司的焦化石脑油加氢精制技术. 2009年中国石油炼制技术大会论文集(补充) .277-281. [2] 李大东. 加氢处理工艺与工程[M]. 北京:中国石化出版社,2004.954-962. [3] 韩崇仁. 加氢裂化工艺与工程[M]. 北京:中国石化出版社,2001.146-189. [4] 李立权. 加氢裂化装置操作指南[M]. 北京:中国石化出版社,2005.256-261.