PETROLEUM PROCESSING AND PETROCHEMICALS ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 96-103.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-11-21
Revised:2025-11-26
Online:2026-02-12
Published:2026-01-27
| [1] WANG Z, SUN Y, KONG H, et al. An in-depth review of key technologies and pathways to carbon neutrality: classification and assessment of decarbonization technologies [J]. Carbon Neutrality, 2025, 4(1). [2] LI D, LI Y, LIU X, et al. NiAl2O4 Spinel Supported Pt Catalyst: High Performance and Origin in Aqueous-Phase Reforming of Methanol [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(10): 9671-82. [3] GAO K, SAHRAEI O A, ILIUTA M C. Development of residue coal fly ash supported nickel catalyst for H2 production via glycerol steam reforming [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 291. [4] ZHU S, MA S, SONG D, et al. Dependence of the strong metal-support interactions of Ni/TiO2 and the induction period of glycerol steam reforming on the dynamic crystal phase evolution [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 489. [5] USMAN M, GHANEM A S, GARBA M D, et al. Green and blue hydrogen production and purification technologies [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 153: 150176. [6] NIU Y, ZENG X, XIA J, et al. Recent progress of green hydrogen production technology [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2025, 19(10): 93. [7] AIE. The Future of Hydrogen:Seizing today’s opportunities [M]. OECD;OCDE, 2019. [8] HASSANPOURYOUZBAND A, VESHAREH M J, WILKINSON M, et al. In situ hydrogen generation from underground fossil hydrocarbons [J]. Joule, 2025, 9(2): 101809. [9] COLLANA J T M, VENEGAS L C, DEXTRE C A, et al. Analysis of the Main Hydrogen Production Technologies [J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(18): 8367. [10] LUO G, ZHAO Z T, DING J, et al. Comparative review of carbon emissions from hydrogen production technologies: The hydrogen color characteristic of biomass-based manufacturing [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, 217: 115756. [11] KHOO H H, HO E H Z, YAP K S, et al. Life Cycle Assessment of biomass resources for hydrogen production [J]. The Science of the total environment, 2025, 1002: 180587. [12] PUTERI M N, GEW L T, ONG H C, et al. Biomass-to-biohydrogen conversion: Comprehensive analysis of processes, environmental, and economic implications [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2025, 200: 107943. [13] MUSTAPHA S I, ANEKWE I M S, AKPASI S O, et al. Biomass conversion for sustainable hydrogen generation: A comprehensive review [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2025, 272: 108210. [14] AZIZIMEHR B, ARMAGHANI T, GHASEMIASL R, et al. A comprehensive review of recent developments in hydrogen production methods using a new parameter [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 72: 716-29. [15] YUJIA L, BIQI Z, ADENIYI L. Recovery and utilization of crude glycerol, a biodiesel byproduct [J]. RSC advances, 2022, 12(43): 27997-8008. [16] FANGXIA Y, A H M, RUNCANG S. Value-added uses for crude glycerol--a byproduct of biodiesel production [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2012, 5(1): 13. [17] AWOGBEMI O, DESAI D A. Progress in the conversion of biodiesel-derived crude glycerol into biofuels and other bioproducts [J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2025, 30: 102106. [18] WANG H, LI H, LEE C K, et al. A systematic review on utilization of biodiesel-derived crude glycerol in sustainable polymers preparation [J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2024, 261(P1): 129536. [19] LIAO M, WANG C, CHEN Y, et al. Self-Reconstruction Mechanism of High-Entropy Oxide in Glycerol Steam Reforming: The Key to H2-rich Syngas Production [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2025, 15(6): 4845-57. [20] MOREIRA R, MORAL A, BIMBELA F, et al. Syngas production via catalytic oxidative steam reforming of glycerol using a Co/Al coprecipitated catalyst and different bed fillers [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2019, 189: 120-33. [21] ROSLAN N A, ABIDIN S Z, IDERIS A, et al. A review on glycerol reforming processes over Ni-based catalyst for hydrogen and syngas productions [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(36): 18466-89. [22] WANG Y, ZHU S, LU J, et al. Boosting hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol via constructing moderate metal-support interaction in Ni@Al2O3 catalyst [J]. Fuel, 2022, 324. [23] WANG Y, LI N, CHEN M, et al. Glycerol steam reforming over hydrothermal synthetic Ni-Ca/attapulgite for green hydrogen generation [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2022, 48: 176-90. [24] GUJAR J P, VERMA A, MODHERA B. Optimizing glycerol conversion to hydrogen: A critical review of catalytic reforming processes and catalyst design strategies [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 109: 823-50. [25] WANG Y, CHEN Y, ZHU S, et al. Ni/CeO2 catalysts for glycerol steam reforming: Effect of calcination modes on the catalytic performance [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 65: 804-16. [26] VAIDYA P D, RODRIGUES A E. Glycerol Reforming for Hydrogen Production: A Review [J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2009, 32(10): 1463-9. [27] SCHWENGBER C A, ALVES H J, SCHAFFNER R A, et al. Overview of glycerol reforming for hydrogen production [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58: 259-66. [28] MACEDO M S, SORIA M A, MADEIRA L M. Process intensification for hydrogen production through glycerol steam reforming [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 146. [29] ALI ZADEH SAHRAEI O, LARACHI F, ABATZOGLOU N, et al. Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming catalyzed by Ni-promoted Fe/Mg-bearing metallurgical wastes [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 219: 183-93. [30] CHARISIOU N D, PAPAGERIDIS K N, SIAKAVELAS G, et al. Glycerol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production over Nickel Supported on Alumina, Zirconia and Silica Catalysts [J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2017, 60(15-16): 1226-50. [31] DESGAGNéS A, ILIUTA M C. Kinetic study of glycerol steam reforming catalyzed by a Ni-promoted metallurgical residue [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 429. [32] DOU B, SONG Y, WANG C, et al. Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of biodiesel byproduct glycerol: Issues and challenges [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 30: 950-60. [33] FASOLINI A, CESPI D, TABANELLI T, et al. Hydrogen from Renewables: A Case Study of Glycerol Reforming [J]. Catalysts, 2019, 9(9). [34] MACEDO M S, KRALEVA E, EHRICH H, et al. Hydrogen production from glycerol steam reforming over Co-based catalysts supported on La2O3, AlZnOx and AlLaOx [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(78): 33239-58. [35] TRAN N H, KANNANGARA G S K. Conversion of glycerol to hydrogen rich gas [J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 42(24). [36] SUFFREDINI D F P, THYSSEN V V, DE ALMEIDA P M M, et al. Renewable hydrogen from glycerol reforming over nickel aluminate-based catalysts [J]. Catalysis Today, 2017, 289: 96-104. [37] SHU G, LIN Y, WANG S, et al. Dynamic Metal–Support Interaction-Activated Sub-Nanometer Pt Clusters on FeOx Supports for Aqueous Phase Reforming and Hydrogenolysis of Glycerol [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2023, 13(13): 8423-36. [38] ARAQUE M, T L M M, VARGAS J C, et al. Effect of the active metals on the selective H2 production in glycerol steam reforming [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 125: 556-66. [39] CHARISIOU N D, SIAKAVELAS G I, PAPAGERIDIS K N, et al. The Effect of Noble Metal (M: Ir, Pt, Pd) on M/Ce2O3-γ-Al2O3 Catalysts for Hydrogen Production via the Steam Reforming of Glycerol [J]. Catalysts, 2020, 10(7). [40] SENSENI A Z, REZAEI M, MESHKANI F. Glycerol steam reforming over noble metal nanocatalysts [J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2017, 123: 360-6. [41] CARVALHO D C, SOUZA H S A, FILHO J M, et al. Nanosized Pt-containing Al2O3 as an efficient catalyst to avoid coking and sintering in steam reforming of glycerol [J]. RSC Advances, 2014, 4(106): 61771-80. [42] DEWOOLKAR K D, VAIDYA D P D. Sorption‐Enhanced Steam Reforming of Glycerol over Ni–hydrotalcite: Effect of Promotion with Pt [J]. ChemCatChem, 2016, 8(22): 3499-509. [43] ADHIKARI S, FERNANDO S D, HARYANTO A. Hydrogen production from glycerol: An update [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(10): 2600-4. [44] MOOGI S, NAKKA L, POTHARAJU S S P, et al. Copper promoted Co/MgO: A stable and efficient catalyst for glycerol steam reforming [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(34): 18073-84. [45] FRACCHIA M, ROONGCHAROEN T, CODURI M, et al. Enhancing and understanding the stability of Ni catalysts via In-promotion for the steam reforming of oxygenates: An in-depth operando XRD-XAS and modeling investigation [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy, 2025, 366. [46] YUNZHU W, SONGSHAN Z, SUFANG H, et al. Nanoarchitectonics of Ni/CeO2 Catalysts: The Effect of Pretreatment on the Low-Temperature Steam Reforming of Glycerol [J]. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12(5): 816-. [47] BOBADILLA L F, ROMERO-SARRIA F, CENTENO M A, et al. Promoting effect of Sn on supported Ni catalyst during steam reforming of glycerol [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(22): 9234-44. [48] NOR S M-N, ZAINAL A S, ASMAWATI R N, et al. The synergistic role of Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst for H2-rich syngas production via glycerol dry reforming [J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2022, 105: 293-308. [49] D. S A, D. Y G. Ni–Cu and Ni–Co Supported on La–Mg Based Metal Oxides Prepared by Coprecipitation and Impregnation for Superior Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming of Glycerol [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(14): 4785-97. [50] PAPAGERIDIS K N, SIAKAVELAS G, CHARISIOU N D, et al. Comparative study of Ni, Co, Cu supported on γ-alumina catalysts for hydrogen production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 152: 156-75. [51] DANG C, WANG H, YU H, et al. Co-Cu-CaO catalysts for high-purity hydrogen from sorption-enhanced steam reforming of glycerol [J]. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2017, 533: 9-16. [52] FEIJOO J, MACEIRAS R, ALFONSíN V, et al. Influence of Catalytic Support on Hydrogen Production from Glycerol Steam Reforming [J]. Hydrogen, 2025, 6(4). [53] YURDAKUL M, AYAS N, BIZKARRA K, et al. Preparation of Ni-based catalysts to produce hydrogen from glycerol by steam reforming process [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 8084-91. [54] CHARISIOU N D, ITALIANO C, PINO L, et al. Hydrogen production via steam reforming of glycerol over Rh/γ-Al2O3 catalysts modified with CeO2 , MgO or La2O3 [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 162: 908-25. [55] TIZIANO M, RAKESH S, PIYALI D, et al. Renewable H2 from glycerol steam reforming: effect of La2O3 and CeO2 addition to Pt/Al2O3 catalysts [J]. ChemSusChe, 2010, 3(5): 619-28. [56] MAO Q, GUO Y, LIU X, et al. Identifying the realistic catalyst for aqueous phase reforming of methanol over Pt supported by lanthanum nickel perovskite catalyst [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2022, 313. [57] WANG Y, CHEN Y, ZHU S, et al. Ni/CeO2 catalysts for glycerol steam reforming: Effect of calcination modes on the catalytic performance [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 65: 804-16. [58] WANG X, LI M, LI S, et al. Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming with/without calcium oxide sorbent: A comparative study of thermodynamic and experimental work [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(12): 1812-8. [59] Y A R, B N E, TERRENCE J, et al. Cr and CeO2 promoted Ni/SBA-15 framework for hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol [J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2023, 30(57): 120945-62. [60] CAKIRYILMAZ N, ARBAG H, OKTAR N, et al. Catalytic performances of Ni and Cu impregnated MCM-41 and Zr-MCM-41 for hydrogen production through steam reforming of acetic acid [J]. Catalysis Today, 2018, 323: 191-9. [61] WANG Y, SUN X, LIANG D, et al. Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production over alkali metals modified kaolin-supported Ni catalysts [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 129: 113-29. [62] DAHDAH E, ESTEPHANE J, GENNEQUIN C, et al. Effect of La promotion on Ni/Mg-Al hydrotalcite derived catalysts for glycerol steam reforming [J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(5). |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||