石油炼制与化工 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 172-180.

• 分析与评定 • 上一篇    下一篇

快速气相色谱法测定汽油单体烃组成及多项物性预测模型的建立

李长秀,王亚敏,张祎玮,王征,钱钦   

  1. 中石化石油化工科学研究院有限公司
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-03 修回日期:2024-08-13 出版日期:2025-01-12 发布日期:2024-12-27
  • 通讯作者: 李长秀 E-mail:licx.ripp@sinopec.com

DETAILED HYDROCARBON ANALYSIS AND PROPERTY PREDICTION OF GASOLINE BY FAST GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

  • Received:2024-07-03 Revised:2024-08-13 Online:2025-01-12 Published:2024-12-27

摘要: 建立了采用40 m×0.10 mm×0.2 μm超细内径非极性色谱柱、氢气作载气的快速分析汽油馏分单体烃组成的方法(简称快速单体烃分析方法)。对于催化裂化汽油C3~C12组分可以得到367个色谱峰,正十二烷的保留时间为30.1 min。同一样品重复测定3次的结果显示组分保留时间极差小于0.02 min,保留指数极差小于0.50。对于质量分数大于0.5%的单体烃组分,含量测定结果的相对标准偏差小于6%;对于质量分数小于0.5%的单体烃组分,含量测定结果的相对标准偏差小于10%。建立了根据汽油单体烃分析结果计算汽油的密度、饱和蒸气压、折射率、碳氢元素含量、平均相对分子质量、溴值的修正计算模型。根据修正模型计算样品的密度、折射率和饱和蒸气压,计算结果与实测结果有较好的一致性。根据快速单体烃分析方法的测定结果和采用50 m×0.20 mm×0.5 μm非极性色谱柱的常规单体烃分析方法的测定结果计算多项物性参数,两种方法下的计算结果一致,说明建立的计算模型也适用于采用快速单体烃分析方法的测定结果计算样品的多项物性参数。

关键词: 汽油, 单体烃, 快速分析, 气相色谱, 物性参数

Abstract: A fast gas chromatographic method for detailed hydrocarbon analysis of gasoline was established by using a 40 m×0.10 mm×0.20 μm narrow diameter non-polar capillary column and H2 as carrier gas. For the fluid catalytic cracking gasoline sample, it could be separated to get 367 chromatographic peaks from C3 to C12 range, with retention time of 30 min for n-dodecane. The absolute difference of retention times for the same component of three runs were less than 0.02 min, and the absolute difference of retention indices were less than 0.50. For the components with concentrations above 0.5%, the relative standard deviations of the results were less than 6%. And for the components with concentrations below 0.5%, the relative standard deviations of the results were less than 10%.Corrected models for calculation of physical/chemical parameters ,including density, refractive index, saturated vapor pressure, carbon and hydrogen element content, bromine number, and average molecular weight, were established. Calculation results of density, refractive index, saturated vapor pressure of gasoline samples showed consistent with the results from real analysis. The physical/chemical parameters calculated using hydrocarbon results from fast analysis showed consistent with that from routine analysis using 50 m×0.20 mm×0.50 μm non-polar column, which meant that the established corrected models could also be used to calculate the physical/chemical parameters with the data from fast analysis.

Key words: gasoline, detailed hydrocarbon, fast analysis, gas chromatography, physical/chemical property