石油炼制与化工 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (12): 70-73.

• 油品与添加剂 • 上一篇    下一篇

长距离管输对3号喷气燃料导电性能和清洁性能的影响

孙静涵,张利新, 王自顺,徐卫民,许峰,阮强   

  1. 中国石油独山子石化公司
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-16 修回日期:2019-08-02 出版日期:2019-12-12 发布日期:2019-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 孙静涵 E-mail:adang105@163.com
  • 基金资助:
     

EFFECTS OF LONG DISTANCE PIPELINE TRANSPORT ON CONDUCTIVITY AND DETERGENCY OF NO.3 JET FUEL

    

  • Received:2019-05-16 Revised:2019-08-02 Online:2019-12-12 Published:2019-12-24
  • Supported by:
     

摘要: 分析了长距离管输后3号喷气燃料电导率严重衰减的原因和补加抗静电剂后对3号喷气燃料电导率和水反应指标的影响。对比了成品油长距离管输和喷气燃料馏分长距离管输对3号喷气燃料电导率和水反应指标的影响,并对比了两种管输方式的优缺点,提出对3号喷气燃料的管输建议。3号喷气燃料的长距离管输,优先采用喷气燃料馏分油管输在末端加注抗静电剂的方式;需兼顾汽运时,宜采用成品油管输并在末端根据电导率衰减情况,最小量补加抗静电剂的方式,以获得较高的成功率和较好的经济效益。

关键词: 管输, 喷气燃料, 电导率, 水反应

Abstract: The reason of serious decline in the conductivity of No. 3 jet fuel after long-distance pipeline transportation and the effect of adding antistatic agent on the conductivity and water reaction of the jet fuel were analyzed. The effects of long-distance pipeline transportation on the electrical conductivity and water reaction of refined jet fuel and distillate fraction were compared to see the advantages and disadvantages of the two pipeline transportation modes. For the long-distance pipeline transportation of No. 3 jet fuel, it was suggested that the preferred way to inject antistatic agent at the end of the pipeline transportation of jet fuel distillate. When the pipeline transport and car transport were needed at the same time, it was advisable to adopt the method of product pipeline transportation and to add the least amount of antistatic agent at the end of pipeline according to the electrical conductivity attenuation.

Key words: pipeline transport, jet fuel, electrical conductivity, water reaction

中图分类号: