两种硫化烯烃的性能对比及其构效关系研究

石油炼制与化工 ›› 2022, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (12): 77-85.

两种硫化烯烃的性能对比及其构效关系研究

宋雪朝^1，2,胡文敬¹,张晓军³,李久盛¹

1. 中国科学院上海高等研究院先进润滑材料实验室 2.中国科学院大学 3. 山西潞安太行润滑科技股份有限公司

收稿日期:2022-05-26 修回日期:2022-08-19 出版日期:2022-12-12 发布日期:2022-12-06
通讯作者: 宋雪朝 E-mail:songxc@sari.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院青年创新促进会;中科院战略性先导科技专项（A类）;上海市浦东新区科技发展基金项目

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON AND STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP OF DIFFERENT SULFURIZDE OLEFINS

#br#

Received:2022-05-26 Revised:2022-08-19 Online:2022-12-12 Published:2022-12-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选择两种不同结构的硫化烯烃润滑添加剂（T321和LZ5340），采用四球摩擦磨损试验机考察了其极压和抗磨性能，并对比了二者的抗铜片腐蚀性能。结果表明：两种硫化烯烃均能有效降低基础油的摩擦系数和磨损率，显著提高油品的极压性能；T321的减摩、抗磨以及抗腐蚀性能均优于LZ5340，但其极压性能略差于LZ5340。采用气相-质谱联用仪（GC-MS）、核磁共振波谱仪（NMR）、红外光谱仪（IR）及元素分析仪对添加剂的组成和结构进行分析，研究两种不同类型硫化烯烃的结构和性能之间的构效关系，发现硫化烯烃的有效组分及活性硫含量的差异均对其性能产生影响。

关键词: 硫化烯烃, 结构分析, 极压抗磨, 铜片腐蚀, 构效关系

Abstract: Two sulfurized olefin lubricating additives (T321 and LZ5340) with different structures were selected to investigate their extreme pressure and anti-wear properties by using four-ball friction and wear testing machines, and their copper strip corrosion resistance were compared. The results showed that two sulfurized olefins could effectively reduce the friction coefficient and wear rate of the base oil, and significantly improve the extreme pressure performance of the oil. Among them, T321 is superior to LZ5340 in anti-friction, wear resistance and copper strip corrosion resistance, but its extreme pressure performance was slightly worse than that of LZ5340. The composition and structure of the additives were analyzed by infrared spectroscopy (IR), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), element analyzer and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR).It was found that the difference of components and active sulfur content had direct influence on the properties of sulfurized olefin. The structure-activity relationship of two sulfurized olefins with different structures was systematically investigated, which could provide guidance for the application of sulfurized olefin lubricating additives.

Key words: sulfurized olefin, structure analysis, extreme pressure and anti-wear, copper corrosion, structure-activity relationship

宋雪朝胡文敬张晓军李久盛. 两种硫化烯烃的性能对比及其构效关系研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2022, 53(12): 77-85.

参考文献

[1] Dasic P, Franek F, Assenova E, et al. International standardization and organizations in the field of tribology[J]. Industrial Lubrication & Tribology, 2003, 48(6): 287-291.
[2] Scharf T W, Kotula P G, Prasad S V. Friction and wear mechanisms in MoS2/Sb2O3/Au nanocomposite coatings[J]. Acta Materialia, 2010, 58(12): 4100-4109.
[3] 苏登成,陶文宏,王平,等.复合纳米润滑油添加剂的制备及其摩擦学性能[J].机械工程材料, 2007, 31(3): 47-50.
[4] Cai M, Yu Q, Liu W, et al. Ionic liquid lubricants: When chemistry meets tribology[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2020, 49(21): 7753-7818.
[5] Erdemir A. Review of engineered tribological interfaces for improved boundary lubrication[J]. Tribology International, 2005, 38(3): 249-256.
[6] 李丽,曾颖峰,刘伟,等.一种新型水基高效液体润滑剂性能评价及应用[J].断块油气田, 2015, 22(3): 398-401.
[7] Su F, Chen G, Huang P. Lubricating performances of graphene oxide and onion-like carbon as water-based lubricant additives for smooth and sand-blasted steel discs[J]. Friction, 2020, 8(1): 47-57.
[8] 赵江.润滑油基础油的现状及发展趋势[J].石油炼制与化工, 2003, 34(3): 38-42.
[9] 鱼鲲,李云鹏.硫系极压抗磨剂研究进展[J].石化技术, 2007, 14(4): 56-60.
[10] Rudnick L R.润滑剂添加剂化学与应用[M].李华峰,李春风,赵立涛,等,译.北京：中国石化出版社，2006: 377-389.
[11] 夏延秋,任霞.润滑油极压抗磨添加剂的应用及发展预测[J].沈阳工业大学学报, 2006, 28(3): 241-245.
[12] 谢恩情,赵昕楠,张云海,等.润滑油极压抗磨添加剂应用研究进展及方向[J].煤炭与化工,2013,36(1):25-27.
[13] 伏喜胜,张龙华,刘伟民.T310A硫代磷酸酯胺盐抗磨添加剂的合成与应用[J].石油炼制与化工,2005, 36(4): 52-56.
[14] 冯玉杰,孙晓君,李培志,等.表面修饰纳米硼酸镧的制备及极压抗磨性能研究[J]. 材料科学与工艺, 2002, 010(002):203-206.
[15] 魏克成,陈晓伟. 双（二甲胺基）磷酸腰果酚酯型抗磨极压剂的合成与摩擦学性能[J]. 合成润滑材料,2020, 47(3): 21-24.
[16] 马春芳.有机多硫极压抗磨剂的制备及性能研究[J].化工科技, 2017, 25(5): 14-18.
[17] 程思,衣守志,闫婷婷.有机硫化酯润滑油添加剂的制备及性能研究[J].润滑与密封, 2016, 41(4): 111-114.
[18] 欧风.摩擦化学节能润滑技术的应用[J].润滑与密封, 1991, 000(001):50-55.
[19] 黄文轩.润滑剂添加剂应用指南[M].北京：中国石化出版社, 2007: 51-53.
[20] Fu S, Tao D, Zhang J, et al. Study on the tribological characteristics of molybdenum polyisobutenyl succinate as an additive in white oil[J]. TRIBOLOGY-BEIJING-, 2003, 23(6): 514-518.
[21]李新芳,王学业,文小红,等.有机二硫化物极压添加剂结构与润滑性能的理论研究[J].摩擦学学报, 2005, 25(1): 39-44.
[22] 刘菲菲,刘利,何国成,等.添加剂对工业齿轮油性能影响的研究[J]. 润滑油, 2006, 21(004):39-42.
[23] 欧风.摩擦化学节能润滑技术的应用[J].润滑与密封, 1991, 000(001):50-55.
[24] Ismail L , Westacott R E , Ni X . On the effect of wax content on paraffin wax deposition in a batch oscillatory baffled tube apparatus[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 137(2):205-213.
[25] 续景,张龙华,伏喜胜.不同工艺制备的硫化烯烃的摩擦学特性研究[J].摩擦学学报, 2002, 22(4): 311-313.
[26] MCGUIRE N. Smarter sulfur [J]. Tribology & Lubrication Technology, 2018, 74(2): 46-56.
[27] 李飞,姜恒,赵杉林,等.一步法高压合成硫化异丁烯产物分析及反应机理[J].应用化学, 2015, 32(7):771-776．
[28] 童宗文,杨洪滨.硫化异丁烯在聚 α-烯烃中的摩擦学性能[J].合成润滑材料, 2012, 39(4): 4-6.
[29] 诸国建,汪帆,张晓君,等.含硫极压抗磨剂对苯基硅油摩擦学性能的影响[J].有机硅材料, 2014, 28(5): 367-369.
[30] 肖林久,孙雷.硫化异丁烯组分的确定以及产品中沉淀物质的形成条件的探究[J].精细石油化工, 2017, 34(5): 57-61.
[31] 余多慰,柯惟中.光动力蛋白C—PC中脱辅蛋白的空间结构研究[J].光散射学报, 1999, 11(4):325-325.
[32] 周克省,黄可龙,王朝栋,等.聚苯硫醚的合成及表征[J].中南矿冶学院学报, 1993, 24(6): 843-846.