垂直-倾斜组合立管中催化剂下料特征分析

石油炼制与化工 ›› 2022, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 53-57.

垂直-倾斜组合立管中催化剂下料特征分析

陈晓玲¹,帕尔哈提·斯地克²,赵国君³,王雅强¹,彭威²

1. 中国石油大学（北京）克拉玛依校区
2. 中石油克拉玛依石化有限责任公司 3.中国石油大庆石化公司

收稿日期:2021-11-08 修回日期:2021-12-24 出版日期:2022-05-12 发布日期:2022-04-24
通讯作者: 陈晓玲 E-mail:cxling612@cupk.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气集团有限公司2021年技能人才创新基金项目资助

ANALYSIS OF CATALYST FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN VERTICAL- INCLINED COMBINED STANDPIPE

Received:2021-11-08 Revised:2021-12-24 Online:2022-05-12 Published:2022-04-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以催化裂化装置典型的垂直-倾斜组合立管（Φ80 mm×3 600 mm）为研究对象，通过试验分析在不同催化剂质量流率下立管内催化剂颗粒的流动状态及其演变过程；并通过分析立管内轴向时均压力和动态压力特性，对催化剂颗粒的流态进行辨识。结果表明：随着催化剂质量流率的增加，立管内催化剂颗粒由稀相流态过渡为密相流态，轴向压力梯度逐渐减小；当催化剂质量流率为720 kg/(m².s)时，组合立管底部出现填充流，轴向压力发生逆转；设置松动风可以避免填充流出现；不同流态的主频范围为0~0.5 Hz。

关键词: 组合立管, 催化剂流态, 动态压力, 松动风

Abstract: A typical vertical-inclined combined standpipe with length of 3 600 mm and diameter of 80 mm was built to investigate the flow patterns of catalyst particles and their evolution under various mass flow rates. The flow patterns were identified by the distribution of the axial pressure and dynamic pressure. The results indicated that with the increase of the catalyst mass flow rate, the flow patterns of catalyst particles in the riser were changed from dilute to dense phase flow, and the axial pressure gradient was gradually decreased. When the catalyst mass flow rate was 720 kg/(m².s), the axial pressure was reversed with the filling flow at the bottom of the risers. The filling flow can be avoided by setting the aerating air. The main frequency range of different flow patterns is 0 - 0.5 Hz.

Key words: combined standpipe, catalyst flow pattern, dynamic pressure, aerating air

陈晓玲帕尔哈提·斯地克赵国君王雅强彭威. 垂直-倾斜组合立管中催化剂下料特征分析[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2022, 53(5): 53-57.

参考文献

[1] 陈俊武, 许友好.催化裂化工艺与工程[M].3版.北京:中国石化出版社, 2015:622-630
[2] 卢春喜, 王祝安.催化裂化流态化技术[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2002: 120-121.
[3] 曹汉昌, 郝希仁, 张韩．催化裂化工艺计算与技术分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2000:222-223
[4]NICCUM, P.K . Update on the catalytic cracking process and standpipes-Part 1[J].Hydrocarbon Processing, 2015, 24(3):67-71
[5]白丁荣, 金涌.循环流态化: 气-固流动规律[J].化学反应工程与工艺, 1991, 7(3):303-317
[6]张济宇, 杨贵林, 杨守扑, 等.负压差移动床的气-固流动[J].化工学报, 1980, 31(3):229-240
[7]罗勇, 乔文清.再生催化剂立管流动受阻故障分析和措施[J].石油化工, 2001, 30(10):781-784
[8]严超宇, 魏志刚, 宋健菲, 等.半再生立管输送催化剂不畅的原因分析和改进措施[J].石油炼制与化工, 2017, 48(9):76-77
[9]刘俊平, 郭泽旭, 张和鼎, 等.催化裂化装置再生立管流化问题分析[J].炼油技术与工程, 2020, 50(08):13-17
[10]罗保林, 宗祥荣, 王中礼, 等.垂直立管中催化剂流动特性的实验研究[J].过程工程学报, 2005, 5(02):119-124
[11]张锋, 何涛, 于立勇, 等.催化裂化装置输送斜管内催化剂流化状态分析[J].石油炼制与化工, 2020, 51(09):60-64
[12]彭威, 刘艳升, 韩胜贤, 等.影响再生立管输送催化剂影响因素的分析[J].化工进展, 2020, 39(08):2947-2953
[13]彭威, 王进, 齐宏伟, 等.催化裂化装置再生立管输送催化剂不畅的原因分析[J].石油炼制与化工, 2018, 49(05):22-26
[14]邓佑鲜, 张万松, 曹晓阳, 等.斜管内流化催化裂化催化剂颗粒流的流态识别[J].中国粉体技术, 2015, 21(3):12-15
[15]曹晓阳, 孔文文, 贾梦达, 等.催化剂在°斜管内下料特性的实验分析[J].石油学报石油加工, 2016, 32(06):1113-1120
[16] 闫雪, 张万松, 刘人锋, 等.垂直立管中颗粒移动床蠕动流动特性的实验研究[J].过程工程学报, 2014, 14(3):383-387
[17]Nagashima Hiroshi, Ishikura Toshifumi, Ide Mitsuharu.Flow characteristics of a small moving bed downcomer with an orifice under negative pressure gradient[J].Powder Technology, 2009, 192(1):110-115
[18]Chen ChengYang, Yao Huang, Sun Zhengliang.et al. Investigation of particle flow behaviors in a simplified downcomer of multistage fluidized bed[J].Powder Technology, 2020, 375(1):292-301
[19] Bai D, Shibuya E., Nakagawa N., et al..Characterization of gas fluidization regimes use pressure fluctuations[J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1996, 23(7):75-81
[20]刘小成，胡小康, 马媛媛, 等.立管内催化剂流动的脉动压力分析[J].石油学报石油加工, 2012, 28(3):445-450
[21] Van Der Schaaf, John Johnsson, Filip Schouten., et al. Fourier analysis of nonlinear pressure fluctuations in gas-solids flow in CFB risers - Observing solids structures and gas/particle turbulence[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54(22):5541-5546
[22]曹晓阳, 周发戚, 陈勇, 等.循环流化床颗粒输送斜管的压力脉动特性[J].石油学报石油加工, 2016, 32(5):913-920
[23]邢颖春, 卢春喜.某催化裂化装置催化剂循环管线松动点的改造[J].石化技术与应用, 2008, 26(1):49-54
[24]李庆慧, 王启民, 李源, 等.径向松动风对循环立管气固两相流动的影响[J].沈阳工业大学学报, 2009, 31(02):135-138