石油炼制与化工 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (11): 100-112.

• 节能减排 • 上一篇    下一篇

提浓干气选择性分离对乙烯分离系统能耗的影响

苏鑫1,刘志禹1,郝广平2   

  1. 1. 中石化(大连)石油化工研究院有限公司
    2. 大连理工大学
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-24 修回日期:2025-07-25 出版日期:2025-11-12 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 苏鑫 E-mail:suxin.fshy@sinopec.com

EFFECT OF SELECTIVE SEPARATION OF CONCENTRATED DRY GAS ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF ETHYLENE SEPARATION SYSTEM


  • Received:2025-04-24 Revised:2025-07-25 Online:2025-11-12 Published:2025-10-24

摘要: 目前炼油厂一般采用浅冷油吸收或变压吸附的方法将炼油厂干气中的C2资源进行富集形成提浓干气,再将提浓干气通入乙烯分离系统进行深冷精馏分离,从而得到高浓度的乙烯产品。然而,在分离过程中提浓干气中存在的大量乙烷会在乙烯分离系统中不断循环,使得系统负荷加大,造成大量额外能耗。为此,通过乙烯分离流程模拟计算,对比提浓干气进行选择性分离的新工艺和不进行选择性分离的常规工艺对乙烯分离系统能耗的影响。结果表明,由于新工艺选择性分离出的富乙烷气直接进入蒸汽裂解炉进行裂解制乙烯,使得在乙烯分离系统内循环的乙烷量比常规工艺低,从而能够分别降低深冷分离单元、C2分离单元、C3分离单元的输入功率达19.52%,32.26%,35.21%,但代价是需要提高急冷单元和压缩单元的输入功率。综合计算各设备的功率情况和整体工艺的运行情况,结果表明,相比于常规工艺,新工艺的电能消耗降低18.67%,循环水消耗量降低15.17%,蒸汽消耗量降低22.52%,乙烯分离系统综合能耗降低22.41%。

关键词: 提浓干气, 乙烯, 选择性分离, 能耗, 精馏

Abstract: Currently, major refineries generally enrich C2 resources in refinery dry gas through oil absorption or PSA to form concentrated dry gas, which is then introduced into the ethylene separation system for distillation separation, thereby obtaining high-concentration ethylene products. However, during the separation process, a large amount of ethane in the concentrated dry gas continuously circulates in the ethylene separation system, increasing system load and causing significant additional energy consumption. Therefore, The effect of a new process for selective separation of concentrated dry gasand a conventional process without selective separation on the energy consumption of the ethylene separation system through simulation of the ethylene separation process was compared and analyzed. The results show that the new process, which selectively separated ethane-rich gas directly into the ethylene cracking furnace, results in a lower amount of ethane circulating within the ethylene separation system compared to the conventional process. This can reduce the input power of the deep-cold-separation unit, C2-separation unit, and C3-separation unit by 19.52%, 32.26% and 35.21%, respectively, but at the cost of increasing the input power of the quench unit and compression unit. Comprehensive calculations of the power consumption of each equipment and the overall process operation indicate that, compared to the conventional process, the new process decreases electric, circulating water, and steam consumption by 18.67%, 15.17% and 22.52%, respectively.Overall, the new process reduces the energy consumption of the ethylene separation system by 22.41%.

Key words: concentrated dry gas, ethylene, selective separation, energy consumption, distillation